How Making A Murderer Continues To Make A Case For Itself

When Making A Murderer premiered in 2015, it helped kick off the true crime trend in pop culture. The Internet has become involved in the case, and almost everyone has an opinion on what really happened.

While most people are convinced Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey were framed, others questioned the documentary’s motive. The Netflix Original series brought attention to a case, a bunch of new information has been discovered. But will it be enough to free both gentlemen?

Who Is Steven Avery?


Avery was wrongfully convicted in 1985 of sexual assault and attempted murder. After 18 years of a 20-year jail sentence, he was exonerated thanks to DNA testing, leading to his release in 2003. He would go on to file a lawsuit against Manitowoc County, and its former sheriff, for $36 million.

But in 2005, he was arrested and charged with the murder of photographer Teresa Halbach. She was last seen taking photos of a car for sale for Auto-Trade Magazine. After a two-year battle, Avery was convicted and sentenced to life in prison in 2007.

Thanks to the documentary, a new development has been made in the case.

His Lawyer Spoke Out After The Court Denied His Latest Request


In December 2018, Avery’s lawyer, Kathleen Zellner, announced a new development in the Avery case. The attorney revealed that she had enlisted the help of one of the world’s leading DNA experts, Dr. Richard Selden.

He agreed to test the bones in the Manitowoc County Gravel Pit, should the court allow it. However, the request was denied by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals. But, that certainly doesn’t mean it’s the end of the road for Avery. Zellner said to Newsweek, “The appellate court wants to resolve the issues on Avery’s current appeal before the new issue re: bone testing is addressed.”

Where Did The Bone Fragments Come From?


Zellner has been attempting to get the bone fragments since 2016, but she’s been unsuccessful. Her request for testing was approved, denied, and is now pending examination by the Court of Appeals. State law says that evidence must be preserved until the defendant is discharged from prison.

Zellner said during an interview, “It isn’t just the pelvic bone, there are about 10 bones that were recovered from the quarry. By giving them to the Halbach family, they just confirmed they believe those bones are human. It’s a very sneaky way to get evidence destroyed.”

Steven Avery Has Won The Latest Motion In His Appeal

Screen Shot 2019-02-27 at 9.21.50 AM

Avery’s attorney, Kathleen Zellner, shared the news on Twitter. This comes after the post-conviction lawyer revealed her latest theory around the case. It was based on the bone fragments found in the Manitowoc County Gravel Pit.

Recently, Zellner made moves to have testing done on this piece of evidence, only to see if they were all human, and belonging to the victim Teresa Halbach. She believes that the Attorney General’s Office has been trying to deceive Avery by hiding this forensic evidence.

Avery Being Granted A Motion Means One Thing

Screen Shot 2019-02-27 at 9.44.21 AM

Zellner says that the bones were not tested for DNA, and returned to Halbach’s family. That’s a violation of state law.

If the bones are found to belong to Ms. Halbach, Zellner argues that it goes against the prosecution’s argument that she was killed at Avery’s car salvage yard in Wisconsin where her remains were originally discovered a week after she went missing. The lawyer said, “This evidence has the potential to undo the whole case, so it is a big win.”

What Happens Now?


Now, evidence surrounding the bones can be submitted, which could lead to a second trial. A new trial would mean Avery’s team can present new evidence that has been discovered since his first trial. Zellner has come up with a steady theory, which names other potential killers of the deceased photographer, as seen in Part 2 of the Netflix series.

Some of the evidence that could be presented relies on forensic testing from a bullet found in Avery’s garage to blood splatter and flakes found in Halbach’s Toyota.

Zellner told Newsweek about a collection of evidence not seen in Part 2, including information on her lead suspect Bobby Dassey.

Has Bobby Dassey Been Arrested?


Part 2 featured revelations about Bobby, which was explosive. The new episodes introduced new evidence in Avery’s case. His attorney has a legal right to explore other persons of interest and to raise the possibility of other culprits known as Denny suspects. Any names put forward must adhere to the stipulations in a 1984 case heard in the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

An attorney must show a motive, opportunity, and evidence that connects that particular subject to the crime. Having taken over the case in 2016, Zellner made it clear she would be following the evidence, as well as the science, which led her right to Bobby.

He Was Called As A Key Witness In Avery’s Trial


Viewers were first introduced to Bobby in Part 1. As a key witness to the trial, he testified for the prosecution. He asserted that he had witnessed Halbach arriving on the Avery property, where he saw her taking photographs.

Additionally, he then claimed he had witnessed her “walking over” to Avery’s trailer and that he didn’t see her leave the property. Now, Zellner has claimed that he lied on the stand. The lawyer has an affidavit from another witness who undermines the version of events Dassey told at the trial.

The Witness Was Bobby’s Brother


Bryan Dassey claims that Bobby told him that he had seen Teresa leave Avery’s salvage yard after finishing her photography job. Bryan has said this constantly since 2005, which is the time when Teresa went missing. However, neither the prosecution nor the defense called him to testify at the trial.

While this evidence justifies suspicion of Bobby, it was about to get much more interesting. Zellner revealed in one episode that her team had access to evidence from the hard drive of Bobby’s computer.

It’s Not New Information


After they reinterviewed him, Zellner’s investigators said that Bobby became “unbelievably rattled” when they mentioned evidence obtain from the computer in his bedroom. It’s not exactly new information, but the police had a search warrant and they seized the computer in 2006.

Lead investigator, Tom Fassbender, transferred it to detective Mike Velie for forensic examination. Paperwork from the results of testing was shared in Part 2 of the documentary. It detailed disturbing and violent adult entertainment imagery within the search history.

That Incriminating Information Was Not Turned Over To Avery’s Defense Team


Since it never reached the team, it appears it went somewhere else. Prosecutor Ken Kratz went to some lengths to hide it, mislabeling the drive as Brendan’s. Fassbender still had the CD containing the findings.

The report would have greatly assisted the defense in Avery’s trial. That could have offered a way for them to discredit the prosecution’s big witness while also providing a Denny suspect. In light of this evidence, many have questioned if Bobby was arrested or imprisoned for the contents of the computer.

Has Brendan Been Released?


It’s no secret that Brendan and his uncle Steven have been appealing the convictions since 2011. There might have been a moment of confusion over whether or not Brendan was actually released- despite the rejection of his appeal in June 2018. A US federal court ordered that he should be released from prison.

That led to Manitowoc County prosecutors appealing the federal court’s decision, which was granted then heard on September 26, 2017. The US Supreme Court has declined to take up the case and will not review whether his confession was voluntary.

The Confession


Let’s rewind to August 2016. A year and a half after Part 1 was released, a federal magistrate, William Duffin, granted Dassey’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, which allows an individual to claim that their detention or imprisonment is unlawful.

Dassey’s confession was indeed deemed as involuntary by Duffin, with Wisconsin given three months to decide whether to retry or release him. The State of Wisconsin decided to appeal the ruling, saying in a statement that it was “coerced by investigators and that no one reasonable court could have concluded otherwise, is wrong on the facts and wrong on the law.” In episode five, this moment plays out from the point of view of those involved.

While Zellner Visits The Avery Property, Steven’s Brother Takes A Personal Phone Call


While she’s visiting to investigate one aspect of Dassey’s case, Chuck Avery, who assisted her, took a personal phone call. “I just found out something,” he tells Zellner, holding out his phone to her. “This is Carla, my daughter. Brendan’s getting released…” “Is he? Today?” Kathleen asks, before taking the phone to clarify.

Carla then explained to her that judge Duffin’s decision “just came online.” When the lawyer asks if they’re going to let him out, Carla said she believed he would get out.

The immediate family – and Zellner herself – are of the belief that Brendan would be released imminently. But, that never happened.

Brendan Wasn’t Actually Released


Wisconsin state prosecutors filed emergency documents to halt Dassey’s release. Additionally, he was ordered to stay in prison pending the outcome of an appeal. Then, the case was put before the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circut. The prosecution presented their arguments to a panel of three judges.

The State would push back once more and in December 2016, the judges of the Seventh Circut voted in favor of upholding Dassey’s conviction. They found that his confession was properly attained by the police.

While the series has everyone asking questions again, here are some key pieces of alleged evidence that were left out of Netflix original documentary.

Prosecutors Actually Attempted To Stop The Documentary From Being Made

Santiago Felipe/Getty Images

The State’s camp wasn’t pleased by the contents behind the series. Following the release of Part 1, filmmakers Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos revealed that the prosecution had actually attempted to halt their project with a subpoena.

Additionally, former Calumet County District Attorney, Ken Kratz, alleged in the subpoena the women were acting as an investigative arm of the defense. Riccardi explained to The Independent, “We brought the motion to quash the subpoena, refuting Mr. Kratz’s accusations as baseless.”

According To Kratz, The Evidence Was Left Out


After Part 1 hit the streaming service, Kratz gave a series of interviews claiming that it was biased. He argued that the film presents misinformation and stated that certain facts of the case were left out.

He mentioned the now-infamous “sweat DNA” found on the car’s hood, and the idea that Avery had dialed Halbach from a withheld number prior to the murder. In an interview with USA Today Network, he doesn’t think the series was balanced. “The audience is never told that attorney Zellner’s ‘new evidence’ was little more than junk science.”

The Past Allegations Behind Avery


Another criticism towards the series is past allegations against Avery. In an email to The Wrap, Kratz asked viewers to remember Steven’s past incident with a cat, soaking it in gasoline or oil before doing much worse. That was merely touched on at the very beginning of the documentary.

However, Kratz has argued that Avery told a different story of the events, and said he had been “young and stupid” for his actions. Avery was open about his criminal record, including two burglaries, but Kratz brought attention to his previous sexual assault allegations, which Avery was never prosecuted for.

There Were Fingerprints On The RAV4


One thing the prosecutors and the defense agree on is that Avery’s blood was found in Halbach’s Toyota. However, they disagree on how it came to be there. During the original trial, the State argued that the finding of blood painted Avery’s guilt by linking him to the crime.

Nevertheless, the defense has maintained that this evidence was simply planted. Dean Strang and Jerry Buting, Avery’s original defense team, theorized that a vial of their client’s blood in storage had been tampered with to provide fake evidence.

His new lawyer has followed new leads and found that the blood could have been taken from somewhere else.

What Wasn’t Presented In The Documentary


The fact that the car has since been tested for fingerprints wasn’t even in the documentary. But, how did they get there? Kathleen Zellner believes that the blood stains in the car are probably the biggest piece of evidence against Avery.

In episode one of Part 2, the lawyer enlisted the help of Stuart James, a bloodstain pattern expert. She provided him with all of the photographs from the scene for analysis. The findings were particularly interesting because the blood next to the steering wheel, as the prosecution argued, would have come from a cut on Avery’s finger.

Stuart James Joined Dr. Larry Blum To Analyze The Blood Patterns


James was joined by the Forensic Pathologist to analyze the blood patterns in an attempt to conclude what actions might have caused them. Zellner’s experts seemed troubled by the lack of blood on the car key, which was found under suspicious circumstances on the floor of Avery’s trailer.

That would be enough for the team to argue that this would not support the prosecution’s theory of how the spatter came to be where it is. Interestingly enough, Dr. Blum said that it’s “inexplicable” for the blood spatter, found in eight different spots within the car, to have come from a source of active bleeding, disputing what Kratz argued in court.

The DNA On The Hood Latch


This was a hotly-consisted piece of evidence from Part 1 that seemed to play a significant part in convincing the jury of Avery’s guilt. His DNA was found on the hood latch, but so was this “sweat DNA” that Kratz argued. In Part 2, forensic DNA consultant, Dr. Karl Reich, concluded that “You can’t test for sweat.”

Additionally, he explained that the only four bodily fluids that can be tested are blood, saliva, semen, and urine. During Zellner’s recreation, the DNA was left by test subjects who opened the hood latch on an identical car was minimal. By contrast, the DNA that was found to be Avery’s at the original crime scene is “rich.”

The Quarry


The area was briefly mentioned in Part 1, but it was featured more in Part 2. Cadaver dogs are often used to search areas in cases where a dead body is likely to be spotted. The dogs went in the opposite direction of Avery’s property as they headed into the quarry.

There, they circled the gravel pit adjacent to Avery’s property before ending up in the spot where Halbach’s car was found. Zellner explains that the dogs were reacting to her scent, but Teresa’s presence over there was never part of the prosecution’s narrative. Also, the quarry was barely mentioned in the trial.

The Damage To Teresa’s Car


The Avery’s had parked vehicles horizontally across the gap to stop access. However, Zellner explains that by analyzing the photographs from the scene and talking to witnesses, the cars had been moved.

What’s more interesting is the damage to Teresa’s car. The car light, found in the boot, is believed to have occurred when pushing the Pinto bumper-to-bumper and out of sight. Avery’s new defense team believes that the “brown smudge” that’s visible on that car light is consistent with the damaged car previously used the block the break in the Berm.

That light is believed to be connected to the murder, but more on that later.

The Blood In The Sink


Steven’s been firm that there would be an opportunity for someone to take blood from his bathroom sink in order to frame him. The theory came into play in Part 2, and since 2005, Avery’s claim is that he was bleeding after he cut his finger.

He bled on the bathroom floor and in the sink. When he left his trailer with his brother Chuck, he then reported seeing tail-lights near his home. The following morning, he went back to the bathroom, but he said the blood was gone.

Teresa’s Ex-Boyfriend


Ryan Hillegas soon became a person of interest for the defense. The ex-boyfriend to Halbach noted that during the original investigation, he was never asked for an alibi and never gave one. He then moved into Teresa’s home shortly after the murder, putting Hillegas in a prime position to access evidence.

He was the one who told investigator’s that Teresa’s car had been damaged previously to her murder. Additionally, he claimed that she had filed an insurance claim but kept the cash and didn’t repair the parking light. Zellner is still convinced that the parking light damage is part of the sequence of events surrounding the murder and that Teresa’s ex-boyfriend had now, unwittingly, connected himself to it.

What’s Item FL?


Brendan Dassey’s highly-contested confession detailed Avery “shooting” Halback. That’s something he first says happened outside the trailer, but he later placed it in the garage. Eventually, investigators found a “lead bullet fragment” in the garage. It was argued by the prosecution at trial that it contained DNA from Halbach.

They said the evidence was consistent enough with the bullet having passed through Teresa’s skull, causing her death. Zellner then took the exemplar bullets to Chris Palenik, a forensic microscopist. The bullet found in the garage, labeled item “FL” did not pass through the skull.

A New Eye Witness


Zellner explained that she had been contacted by an eye witness who had been “bothered by something for a long time.” The man was a local truck driver, and told her that he’d seen Halbach’s car two days before it was found on the Avery property.

The witness also claimed that he had told a Manitowoc officer where it was. Having watched Part 1, the witness identified that officer to be Sergeant Colburn, but no police report was ever written up.

Andrew Colburn Denies The Allegations


Netflix and the filmmakers behind the series are being sued for defamation. In December 2018, the former police sergeant filed a suit claiming that the true crime series wrongfully accused him of framing Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey for Teresa’s murder by suggesting he planted key evidence at the Avery salvage yard.

According to The Wrap, the lawsuit states “Neither plaintiff nor any other law enforcement officer planted evidence or in any other way attempted to frame Avery or Dassey for Halbach’s murder.”

Brendan’s Stepfather Cleared The Air


That same truck driver reached out to Scott Tadych about Teresa’s car, but it never went further. Zellner later found out that Teresa’s car was actually seen by Tadych’s property. Tadych testified that he had seen Bobby on the very same road as the alleged car sighting while he was on his way to hunt deer behind his trailer.

Despite all of this new evidence being out there, it doesn’t seem close to a conclusion on what really happened. Whether or not Avery is innocent or not, it’s becoming more clear that there’s a number of holes in the case against him.